🎤
Comedipedia
🌀

Absurdism

Sustained nonsense that refuses to resolve.

What is Absurdism?

Absurdist humor abandons the incongruity-resolution contract: instead of a setup cleanly flipping into a second reading, the logic just stays broken. The laugh comes from the audience giving up on making sense of it. Stewart Lee, Eric Andre, Tim Robinson all live here.

How it works

  1. 1.The joke introduces a premise that violates basic logic or causality.
  2. 2.Instead of resolving, the joke commits harder to the premise.
  3. 3.Humor emerges from the sustained incongruity and the audience's failed prediction loop.
  4. 4.Often requires patience from the audience — short-form absurdism frequently bombs.

Signals you've found it

When to reach for it

Absurdism rewards long-form. It builds a world where the rules are broken, and pays off by refusing to break the spell. Works best when the performer or writer is confident enough to sit with silence.

10 examples from the joke corpus

Top-scored absurdism jokes from our 359K Reddit and web corpus.

Guy : Doctor, my Girlfriend is pregnant but we always use protection and the rubber never broke. How is it possible? Doctor : Let me tell you a story: "There was once a Hunter who always carried a gun wherever he went. One day he took out his Umbrella instead of his Gun and went out. A Lion suddenly jumped infront of him. In order to scare the Lion, the Hunter used the Umbrella like a Gun, and shot the Lion, then it died! Guy : Nonsense! Someone else must have shot the Lion.. Doctor : Good! You understood the story. Next patient please..

absurdismdialogueclean59,463Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'Guy : Doctor, my Girlfriend is pregnant but we always use protection and the rubber never broke. How is it possible?...', then the trigger 'Next patient please..' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

A man obsessed with trains finally steals one and immediately crashes it, killing several people... At the trial, the man is found guilty of multiple murders and sentenced to death. Before he faces his sentence, he's offered a last meal, and asks for a single banana, which is given to him. The next day, he's led to the electric chair. They strap him in, pull the switch, and... nothing happens. There's never been a failure before. But because you cannot punish a person twice for the same crime, the court is forced to let him go free. Within a week's time, naturally, the man, who is obsessed with trains, goes and steals another one. He doesn't care that he can't drive it or that he failed catastrophically before; he is obsessed with trains and his only desire is to operate one. As before, he crashes it, and kills several people. Again, he stands trial, and again, he is sentenced to death, showing no remorse, only delight that he got to operate the train. His last meal request is a single banana. When he goes to the chair, the executioner pulls the switch, but nothing happens. He goes free again. The train-obsessed maniac, once more on the loose, wastes no time in hijacking a train and crashing it. His trial is speedy, because this has already happened twice, and he is sentenced to death. They ask him what he'd like for his last meal. "A single banana," he says. "Oh, no you don't, you son of a bitch. We're on to you, now. We know all about your little banana trick, and you're not escaping this time!" The guards refuse his request, and instead serve him a standard last meal of steak, potatoes, and berry cobbler. The next morning they strap him into the electric chair, pull the switch, and... nothing happens. "*Did you give him the banana?*" demands the head guard. "No, sir! He asked for the banana but we didn't give it to him, we swear!" says one of the guards. Turns out the banana had nothing to do with anything. He was just a really bad conductor.

absurdismstoryedgy51,907Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'A man obsessed with trains finally steals one and immediately crashes it, killing several people... At the trial, the...', then the trigger 'He was just a really bad conductor.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

My wife walked in on me while I was watching porn. In a panic reflex I instantly changed to a random channel, the fishing channel. As my wife walks out again she says: "you should stay on the porn channel... you know how to fish."

absurdismstoryclean48,098Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'My wife walked in on me while I was watching porn. In a panic reflex I instantly changed to a random channel, the fis...', then the trigger 'you know how to fish."' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

Hitler, Salin, and EA were having a debate "Who amongst us is the most hated?" Hitler asked Stalin said "It is I, the Soviet Union killed more people than even you, Hitler!" EA says "NONSENSE! I've ruined dozens of game franchises. I am the most hated!" Hitler said "Why don't we hold a vote in hell and see who is the most hated of all?" The group agreed and Hitler left to go make the vote. After counting the ballots, Hitler returns and asks: "Who the fuck is Ajit Pai!?" *.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* EDIT: I spell things poorly. EDIT 2: I made the front page, and was guilded! Thanks guys! I hope my joke made your day just a little better.

absurdismdialogueedgy45,401Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'Hitler, Salin, and EA were having a debate "Who amongst us is the most hated?" Hitler asked Stalin said "It is I, the...', then the trigger 'I hope my joke made your day just a little better.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

Jehovah's Witnesses don't celebrate Halloween I guess they don't appreciate random people coming up to their door.

absurdismsetup-punchlineclean42,885Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'Jehovah's Witnesses don't celebrate Halloween', then the trigger 'I guess they don't appreciate random people coming up to their door.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

Punishing me for underperforming for 1 day in 2 years? No problem. Hello everyone, I will try to be concise. **BACKROUND** I work at a company where I handle mid to high level complaints to managers, PR and legal. My daily requirement is 40 cases handled per day, there are some of my team colleagues that struggle with this, but I don't, and I don't feel lazy to stop at 40, so I have handled 50-55 basically every day for the past two years. There is no bonus (or even recognition) for this, I just did it because I felt a friendly obligation to the company. Complaints can be a 5 minute resolution, or a 2 hour zoom call with our New York lawyers, it's a gamble really. **THE EVENT** Recently I had a day where I felt a bit sick and at the same time, had bad luck of getting only very hard cases that required more time, so I had 39 cases (1 under the requirement). I thought nothing of it, as my weekly average way off the charts, 50+ as usual. The very next day I felt better and went back to my usual high numbers. Come Monday, I had a "emergency 1-on-1" with my manager where I was informed that I had to attend a 3 day workshop/seminar on how to best meet requirements, because I "underperformed last week." My jaw dropped, and I asked don't they count the weekly, monthly, yearly numbers, to which I was told that the "daily requirement is 40, and this is standard practice, nothing we can do." Basically it was a workshop for underperformers who had 20-30 out of 40 cases daily, it was nothing hard, but I did need to drive there for 3 days after work and listen to HR guys giving bad advice (as they never actually handled the cases in real life) and I had to talk about what will I do to improve my numbers and "reach the 40", as they nonsense HR talk calls it. This made me lose hours and hours of my free time and I was livid. After it was over, I had a long think and I decided that I will do exactly that. I will "reach the 40" and that's it. **THE AFTERMATH** For the past few months, I go into work, I handle 40 cases, my daily requirement, and then I do NOTHING for the rest of my shift. I have had multiple 1-on-1's with my manager during this time, and I am constantly asked: "is something wrong", to which I naively reply "no, am in trouble, am I underperforming?" and then of course they say that I am 100% within daily requirements and that way I shut the conversation down. This is real life, so I can't really say a clever comeback or something like that, but I do keep "playing the fool" that has no idea what is wrong now, but I find satisfaction in knowing that they got used to my overachieving and are now suffering for the lack of it. Before Easter, they put up an internal ad for promoting another 2 managers, so my guess is how that is the number of people they will now need to pay extra, just because they lost me as an overachiever, and they lost me for no reason other than their own stupidity. Thank you all, I hope I did not bore you.

absurdismstoryedgy33,441Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'Punishing me for underperforming for 1 day in 2 years? No problem. Hello everyone, I will try to be concise. **BACKRO...', then the trigger 'Thank you all, I hope I did not bore you.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

“Do all the work yourself or get 0%” In high school I was in a science class that I did very well in. I was top of the class and scored nearly 100% on every test and assignment. The teacher assigned a big group project that would take about a week to complete with a team of four students. Groups were randomly assigned, and unfortunately, I was paired up with three kids who were barely passing the class. In class we are given time to make plans together as a group to divide up work, examine the instructions, schedule times outside of school to meet up, etc. It was at this point my teammates decided to tell me that they weren’t going to do any work on the project. I asked why, and they said they knew I really cared about my grade, so they figured I would do it on my own. They were so lazy they were banking on the fact I wouldn’t tank my own grade, so they could benefit off of my hard work when I inevitably got a good score on the project. I was pissed and said that was unfair. They dug in and said “Too bad. Now you either do this project yourself or you’ll get a 0%.” Cue malicious compliance. Now, I could have gone to the teacher and he probably would have sorted this out, but a better idea struck me. So I said “Fine, you win. I’ll do what you say.” They smiled smugly and thought that was that. But you see, this teacher had a policy that at the end of the semester your lowest grade (excluding finals) would be taken off your record. So, if you forgot to turn in an assignment or did really bad on one test, you got a mulligan so it wouldn’t ruin your final grade. I had never done poorly on an assignment all year, so I never needed my mulligan. However, I knew that these shitheads all did. If they got a big fat zero on a crucial assignment, they would probably fail the class. So, I did exactly as they instructed. I did no work on the project all week. Just sat on it and bided my time. At the beginning of the next week all the students turned in their assignments. My team watched as I sat in my chair, unmoving. Finally one said: CLASSMATE: Hey OP, aren’t you going to turn in the project?” ME: Oh, I didn’t do the project. They were shocked and asked why the hell I didn’t do it. ME: You said do all the work or get a 0%. I choose 0%. They were all royally pissed. They all had to do credit recovery over the summer. They hated my guts, but I couldn’t have cared less. It was the most satisfying failing grade in my entire life.

absurdismdialogueedgy23,965Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward '“Do all the work yourself or get 0%” In high school I was in a science class that I did very well in. I was top of th...', then the trigger 'It was the most satisfying failing grade in my entire life.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

Boss said I must use my vacation before month end but also “no one can take time off”, so I read the policy Company sends a shiny HR email, subject line all caps, USE IT OR LOSE IT. We had to burn our remaining PTO by the 30th or it evaporates into the sun. Same day, my manager announces in standup that due to quarter end “no one can take time off until the 1st.” I asked how to reconcile that, he shrugs and says talk to HR. HR says talk to your manager. Cute loop. So I opened the handbook, because I am a petty librarian when annoyed. Page 14 has this little sentence I never noticed. “PTO requests not explicitly denied in writing within 48 business hours are considered approved.” There is also a note that partial day PTO is allowed in 1 hour blocks. Thank you, legal team. I submitted ten separate requests. Two hours every morning next week, two hours every afternoon the week after, a random Friday 3 to 5 to watch a plumber, and one full day to visit my mom. I sent the requests in our HR portal, which auto emails the manager and CCs a shared mailbox nobody watches. Then I went back to my tasks and set reminders. Forty eight business hours pass. No denial. The portal changes each request to approved, green checkmark, confetti gif. Monday comes and at 9.58 I put a cheerful note in the team chat. “Heading out, see you at noon.” Manager pings me to hop on a client call, I reply with a screenshot of the policy and the portal approval. Silence. Then three dots typing, then nothing. By Wednesday our calendar looked like cheese. Half the team remembered they also had PTO sitting around and started filing it in little blocks. Meetings kept colliding with green bars. Finance realized that if we did not use the days now, they would be paid out at separation later, which they hate. HR wrote a new post saying we should “coordinate” but that approvals already granted stand. My manager called a huddle to ask why productivity dipped. I said we are following HR’s instruction to use PTO. He said he meant in November. I sent him the original email timestamped this month. He sighed and said he never thought anyone would actually read the handbook. I used every hour, took my mom to lunch, and my plumber fixed the cursed sink at 3.40 while I drank tea. Next week a new policy appeared. PTO must be requested in full day increments during quarter end, and managers must respond in 24 hours. Thanks for clarifying, truly.

absurdismstoryclean23,267Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'Boss said I must use my vacation before month end but also “no one can take time off”, so I read the policy Company s...', then the trigger 'Thanks for clarifying, truly.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

A man is buying a banana, an apple and two eggs. The female cashier says: "You must be single." The man answers: "Wow, how did you know?" Cashier: "Because you're ugly."

absurdismdialogueclean21,409Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'A man is buying a banana, an apple and two eggs. The female cashier says: "You must be single." The man answers: "Wow...', then the trigger 'Cashier: "Because you're ugly."' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

I told my daughter, "Did you know that humans eat more bananas than monkeys?" She rolled her eyes at me, but I persevered. "It’s true!" "When was the last time you ate a monkey?!"

absurdismstoryclean16,573Tier A
Why is this funny? (Comedy Stack Analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'I told my daughter, "Did you know that humans eat more bananas than monkeys?" She rolled her eyes at me, but I persev...', then the trigger '"When was the last time you ate a monkey?!"' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

10 stand-up excerpts using absurdism

Short attributed bits from live performances where this mechanism is the primary driver.

You know what I mean? Fly over the Ethiopia: “There’s a guy that needs a banana!” “Thank you, thank you…” The stealth – banana.

Bill HicksRELENTLESS(1991)
absurdismsetup-punchlineclean24 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'You know what I mean?', then the trigger 'Fly over the Ethiopia: “There’s a guy that needs a banana!” “Thank you, thank you…” The stealth – banana.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

When you have the perfect Porcelain skin of a china doll, That’s no place for the random Black wiry ass hair of a rodent.

Doug StanhopeBEFORE TURNING THE GUN ON HIMSELF(2012)
absurdismsetup-punchlineclean24 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'When you have the perfect Porcelain skin of a china doll, That’s no place for the', then the trigger 'random Black wiry ass hair of a rodent.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

Know thay guys? (AUDIENCE APPLAUD) (CHUCKLES) I would watch that. Scottish Border Cops. Goin’ through the guy’s bag, “And what’s this?” “It’s a banana.

Kevin BridgesThe Story Continues(2012)
absurdismstoryclean24 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'Know thay guys? (AUDIENCE APPLAUD) (CHUCKLES) I would watch that. Scottish Border Cops.', then the trigger 'Goin’ through the guy’s bag, “And what’s this?” “It’s a banana.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

I don’t want to go to jail over nonsense, man. Jail’s– I don’t want to do that. Push–I don’t want to mush a girl.

Patrice O’NealElephant in the Room(2011)
absurdismstoryclean24 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'I don’t want to go to jail over nonsense, man. Jail’s– I don’t want to do that.', then the trigger 'Push–I don’t want to mush a girl.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

She was like clamped on, and she’s kicking. It was so much fun. And then she got off and another random child just clamped on.

Louis C.K.Live at the Beacon Theatre(2011)
absurdismstoryclean25 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'She was like clamped on, and she’s kicking. It was so much fun.', then the trigger 'And then she got off and another random child just clamped on.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

Could go either way. Or just some, you know, random drug addict. [laughing] All right, good.

Marc MaronThinky Pain(2013)
absurdismstoryedgy16 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'Could go either way. Or just some, you know, random drug addict.', then the trigger '[laughing] All right, good.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

“I come to a restaurant at random, “I get seated in your section, “and I recognize you from your I.D. “That’s burned into my memory.

Tom SeguraCompletely Normal(2014)
absurdismsetup-punchlineclean25 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward '“I come to a restaurant at random, “I get seated in your section, “and I recognize you from your I.D.', then the trigger '“That’s burned into my memory.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

It’s a waste of time. People just go out at random to anything. I normally sell stuff after the show. I wasn’t gonna bother tonight.

Stewart LeeCarpet Remnant World(2012)
absurdismstoryclean25 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'It’s a waste of time. People just go out at random to anything. I normally sell stuff after the show.', then the trigger 'I wasn’t gonna bother tonight.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

I’m not an idiot. And they nick all our words, like bananas. What do they do? Get rid of the letter B, call them, ananas.

Lee MackGOING OUT LIVE(2010)
absurdismstorymild25 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'I’m not an idiot. And they nick all our words, like bananas. What do they do?', then the trigger 'Get rid of the letter B, call them, ananas.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

One more thing for baseball. Out in the outfield I would have a series of randomly placed landmines. “There’s Marshall settling under that ball.

George CarlinPLAYING WITH YOUR HEAD(1986)
absurdismstoryclean24 wordssource ↗
Why it works (Comedy Stack analysis)

The setup points the reader toward 'One more thing for baseball. Out in the outfield I would have a series of randomly placed landmines.', then the trigger '“There’s Marshall settling under that ball.' forces a reinterpretation. The main mechanism is absurdism.

Related mechanisms

Test a joke for Absurdism

Paste any joke into the Comedy Stack Analyzer and see whether it scores as absurdism — plus all the other mechanisms our corpus tracks.

Analyze a Joke